HYC PGR x harvest date interaction

2022

Research organisation
Funding source

Trial details

Researcher(s) N/A
Year(s) 2022
Contributor Field Applied Research (FAR) Australia
Trial location(s) Frankland River, WA
HYC PGR x harvest date interaction locations
Aims

To assess the value of PGRs with delayed harvest in HRZ regions for its effect on grain yield losses due to harvest timing, lodging, head loss and brackling.

Key messages

• There was no significant interaction between PGR management, harvest date and variety. However, when harvested on-time, a single Moddus Evo spray was lower yielding compared to the untreated management but when harvest was delayed by almost a month, the single spray became significantly higher yielding than the split Moddus Evo management.
• Cyclops produced a yield of 4.74 t/ha which was significantly higher than Leabrook 4.31 t/ha, when averaged across all treatments in the trial.
• Leabrook was shown to be more prone to head loss when harvest is delayed and no PGR intervention used, however this did not translate into significant differences in final grain yield.
• The delayed harvest date did produce a significantly higher yield but did also create higher levels of lodging and brackling in both cultivars.
• In Cyclops, the shorter variety, the untreated control yielded the highest in both the on time and delayed harvest, with the use of PGR’s reducing yield. The inverse in true for Leabrook, with the application of some PGR’s increasing yield when compared to the control.

Frankland River WA 2022

Trial design: Factorial (PGR x Harvest Date x Variety)

Rotation position: 1st Cereal after canola
Soil type: Forest gravel loam

Lead research organisation Field Applied Research (FAR) Australia
Host research organisation Field Applied Research (FAR) Australia
Trial funding source GRDC FAR2004-002RTX
Related program N/A
Acknowledgments N/A
Other trial partners Not specified
Download the trial report to view additional trial information

Method

Crop type Cereal (Grain): Barley
Treatment type(s)
  • Growth regulator
  • Growth regulator : Rate
  • Growth regulator : Timing
  • Harvest : Timing
Trial type Experimental
Trial design Randomised,Replicated

Frankland River 2022

?>
Sow rate or Target density 200 seeds/m2
Sow date 20 April 2022
Harvest date On time harvested on 22 Nov 2022. Delayed harvested on 20 Dec 2022
Trial design method O Other
Trial design arrangement 16 rows x 4 cols
Total plots 64
Plot size Not specified
Plot replication 4
Psuedoreplication N
Plot randomisation Y
Fertiliser

Sowing Fertiliser: 139 kg MAP/ MOP

Nitrogen: 31 May- 55 kg N/ha (20K)

30 June- 32 kg N/ha

Fungicide

30 June (GS31): 300 mL/ha Prosaro

Seed treatment Vibrance / Cruiser
Download the trial report to view additional method/treatment information
Trial source data and summary not available
Check the trial report PDF for trial results.
Observed trial site soil information
Trial site soil testing
Not specified
Soil conditions
Trial site Soil texture
Frankland River, WA Forest gravel
Derived trial site soil information
Australian Soil Classification Source: ASRIS
Trial site Soil order
Frankland River, WA Sodosol

Climate

Derived climate information

No observed climate data available for this trial.
Derived climate data is determined from trial site location and national weather sources.

Frankland River WA

Loading
Loading
Loading

Some data on this site is sourced from the Bureau of Meteorology

SILO weather estimates sourced from https://www.longpaddock.qld.gov.au/silo/
Jeffrey, S.J., Carter, J.O., Moodie, K.B. and Beswick, A.R. (2001). Using spatial interpolation to construct a comprehensive archive of Australian climate data , Environmental Modelling and Software, Vol 16/4, pp 309-330. DOI: 10.1016/S1364-8152(01)00008-1.

Trial report and links

2022 trial report

2022 trial report



Trial last modified: 13-01-2025 15:24pm AEST