| Researcher(s) |
Nick Poole |
|---|---|
| Year(s) | 2022 |
| Contributor | Field Applied Research (FAR) Australia |
| Trial location(s) |
Wallendbeen, NSW
|
To determine optimum nutrient management for hyper-yielding Wheat by subjecting RGT Accroc feed red wheat to 10 nutrition treatments of varying nitrogen and manure rates.
• Following six years of pasture legume 2013-18 inc. (Fescue/Lucerne/Clover) and three years of cropping (canola 2019 (cut for forage), grazing wheat 2020 and canola 2021, there was no yield response to applied nitrogen (80-280kg N/ha).
• With 142kg N/ha in the soil 0 – 60cm on 2 June the zero N treatment (only 12kg N/ha MAP applied) yielded 9.26 t/ha with a protein of 9.5% indicating the presence of 154kg N/ha in grain.
• If 75% of the N is assumed to be in the grain and 25% in the straw residue, then the total N uptake at harvest in zero N plots would be 205kg N/ha indicating approximately 63kg N/ha coming from the soil via 163mineralization.
• If straw residue was returned to the paddock the nitrogen balance would indicate that 142 kg N/ha was available in the soil in the winter (12N from MAP) and 142kg N/ha removed in the grain at harvest.
• All N applications as urea applied as 2 or 3 split applications only served to increase protein but not yield.
• Despite the application of a PGR at GS31 (Moddus/Errex), increasing N served to increase head number and lodging pressure.
• Applying N as a three split at 200kg N/ha applied moderated the lodging pressure slightly but the difference was not significant.
• Applying manure or the equivalent macro nutrients carried in the manure on top of 160kg N/ha gave no yield benefit, and where the equivalent macro nutrients were applied, significantly reduced yield as a result of increased crop lodging.
• There were no significant differences in harvest dry matter as a result of N application.
• The zero N treatment had the highest test weight and lowest screening.
Trial design: Factorial (Nutrition)
| Lead research organisation |
Field Applied Research (FAR) Australia |
|---|---|
| Host research organisation |
Field Applied Research (FAR) Australia |
| Trial funding source | GRDC FAR2004-002RTX |
| Related program | N/A |
| Acknowledgments | N/A |
| Other trial partners | Not specified |
| Crop type | Cereal (Grain): Wheat |
|---|---|
| Treatment type(s) |
|
| Trial type | Experimental |
| Trial design | Randomised,Replicated |
| Sow rate or Target density | 180 seeds/m2 |
|---|---|
| Sow date | 21 April 2022 |
| Harvest date | 5 January 2023 |
| Trial design method | O Other |
| Trial design arrangement | 10 rows x 4 cols |
| Total plots | 40 |
| Plot size | Not specified |
| Plot replication | 4 |
| Psuedoreplication | N |
| Plot randomisation | Y |
| Fertiliser |
Please refer to trial report for treatment details |
| Fungicide |
GS31: Prosaro 300ml/ha GS61: Epoxiconazole 125 500ml/ha |
SILO weather estimates sourced from https://www.longpaddock.qld.gov.au/silo/
Jeffrey, S.J., Carter, J.O., Moodie, K.B. and Beswick, A.R. (2001). Using spatial interpolation to
construct a comprehensive archive of Australian climate data , Environmental Modelling and Software, Vol
16/4, pp 309-330. DOI: 10.1016/S1364-8152(01)00008-1.