Epidemiology of Septoria Tritici Blotch in the low and medium rainfall zones of Southern region to inform IDM strategies

2021 - 2024
CC BY 4.0

Research organisation
Funding sources

Trial details

Researcher(s) Hari Dadu
Tara Garrard
Grant Hollaway
Julian Taylor
Contact email hari.dadu@agriculture.vic.gov.au
Contact phone 0456665249
Year(s) 2021 - 2024
Contributor Agriculture Victoria
Trial location(s) Booleroo (LRZ), SA
Hart (MRZ), SA
Waite (HRZ), SA
Hamilton (HRZ), VIC
Kinnabulla (LRZ), VIC
Longerenong (MRZ), VIC
Nullawil (LRZ), VIC
Wallup (MRZ), VIC
Watchupga (LRZ), VIC
Epidemiology of Septoria Tritici Blotch in the low and medium rainfall zones of Southern region to inform IDM strategies locations
Aims
  • To study the epidemiology of Septoria tritici blotch in wheat grown in the medium and low rainfall zones of the Southern region.
  • To assess the impact of Septoria tritici blotch (STB) in wheat and identify effective integrated disease management (IDM) strategies for its control in the MRZ and LRZ of the Southern region.
Key messages

Key findings and achievements

1. STB epidemiology and disease risk factors

  1. The lifecycle of Zymoseptoria tritici is polycyclic and involves both sexual (ascospores) and asexual (pycnidiospores) reproduction phases in Southern Australia.
  2. Spore trap data confirmed that wheat stubble is a major source of early-season STB infection, with peak spore release occurring in winter months where average temperatures are low (10-15°C).
  3. Rainfall is a key driver of in-crop STB risk, with higher spring rainfall increasing spore dispersal and disease severity.
  4. Late-season disease pressure is primarily driven by spores traveling from neighbouring fields, limiting the long-term effectiveness of localized stubble management alone.
  5. Early sowing significantly increases disease risk, particularly in susceptible (S, SVS) wheat varieties, due to prolonged exposure to early inoculum under wet conditions.

2. Economic analysis of integrated disease management (IDM) strategies

A combination of variety resistance, targeted fungicide use, stubble management, and crop rotation provided the best economic and disease control outcomes.

Variety resistance: the most cost-effective STB management tool

  1. Less susceptible wheat varieties consistently reduced disease severity and minimized yield loss, offering an economic advantage of up to $433/ha compared to susceptible varieties in MRZ.
  2. Growing susceptible varieties (S, SVS) in high-risk seasons such as 2022 resulted in substantial yield losses (up to 43%) and required greater fungicide inputs, reducing profitability.

Fungicide applications: effective in high-risk seasons but not always profitable

  1. Fungicide profitability varied depending on disease pressure and yield potential:
    • In high-disease years (e.g., 2022), fungicide applications increased gross margins by up to $459/ha in MRZ.
    • In low-disease years (e.g., 2021), fungicides resulted in financial losses, reinforcing the importance of seasonal disease monitoring.
    • In crops with <3 t/ha yield potential (low-rainfall regions and dry seasons), fungicide applications often failed to provide a positive return on investment.
  2. The most effective fungicide strategy was two foliar sprays at Z31 and Z39, but profitability was highly dependent on seasonal conditions and variety selection.

Stubble management: reduces early-season risk but not late-season disease

  1. Higher stubble loads were associated with increased early-season STB risk.
  2. Baling, burning, and cultivation significantly reduced early inoculum levels, but due to long-distance spore movement from neighbouring paddocks, stubble management had minimal impact on late-season disease.
  3. Economic benefits from stubble reduction were site-specific, as growers in high-risk areas benefited more from variety selection and fungicide strategies than from stubble management alone.

Crop rotation and sowing time: reducing disease risk and maximizing economic returns

  1. Rotating wheat with non-host crops (e.g., canola, pulses) effectively reduced inoculum loads, resulting in lower STB risk and improved profitability.
  2. A minimum one-year break between consecutive wheat crops is recommended to effectively reduce STB risk. However, since the stubble source is not a limiting factor, infection can still occur from spores dispersed from neighbouring fields during the season.
  3. Early-sown wheat (April) had up to 21% greater yield loss due to STB, while delaying sowing (May) reduced disease pressure and minimized fungicide dependence.

Industry impact and recommendations

When and how industry can benefit

This research provides practical, data-driven management strategies that can be immediately adopted to enhance disease control, reduce input costs, and maximize farm profitability:

  1. Variety resistance should be the primary strategy for STB management, with MSS or better-rated varieties offering significant cost savings and reduced reliance on fungicides.
  2. Fungicide applications should be targeted based on seasonal disease risk and yield potential:
  • For crops with >3 t/ha yield potential, two foliar sprays at Z31 and Z39 provided the highest economic returns in high-disease years.
  • For crops with <3 t/ha yield potential, fungicide use should be carefully evaluated, as returns were often minimal.
  1. Stubble management reduces early-season risk but does not eliminate late-season disease, so a combination of variety resistance and fungicide application remains essential in high-risk regions.
  2. Crop rotation with non-host crops reduces STB inoculum loads, improving wheat productivity.
  3. Delaying sowing to May in the MRZ and LRZ can significantly lower early STB pressure and fungicide reliance, leading to higher economic returns.

Who can benefit

  1. Growers in MRZ and LRZ looking to maximize economic returns through variety selection, strategic fungicide use, and crop rotation.
  2. Advisors and agronomists developing seasonally adaptive STB management plans tailored to regional disease risk and economic conditions.
  3. Breeders and seed companies working on improving STB resistance in wheat varieties to reduce the reliance on fungicides.

Conclusion

This project highlights the importance of IDM strategies that combine variety resistance, targeted fungicide use, stubble management, and crop rotation. Implementing these findings will enable growers to reduce unnecessary fungicide applications, optimize input costs, and sustain wheat productivity across MRZ and LRZ, particularly in high-rainfall seasons and variable-yield environments.

 

Lead research organisation Agriculture Victoria
Host research organisation Agriculture Victoria
Trial funding source GRDC DJP2104_004RTX
Trial funding source AgVic DJP2104_004RTX
Trial funding source SARDI DJP2104_004RTX
Related program N/A
Acknowledgments

This research was co-funded by GRDC, Agriculture Victoria and SARDI through the "Epidemiology of Septoria tritici blotch in the low and medium rainfall zones of Southern Australia to inform IDM strategies (DJP2104_004RTX)". The authors would like to thank Dr Andrew Milgate (NSW DPI) for his scientific input and field teams at AgVic, SARDI, BCG, HFS and UNFS for technical input and continued assistance in trial management. 


Other trial partners South Australian Research and Development Institute (SARDI), Birchip Cropping Group (BCG), Hart Field Site (HFS), Upper North Farming Systems (UNFS), The University of Adelaide
Download the trial report to view additional trial information

Method

Crop type Cereal (Grain): Wheat
Treatment type(s)
  • Crop : Variety
  • Crop : Rotation
  • Fungicide : Timing
Trial type Experimental
Trial design Randomised,Replicated,Blocked

Booleroo (LRZ) 2024

Sow date Not specified
Harvest date Not specified
Plot size Not specified
Plot replication Not specified

Hart (MRZ) 2024

Sow date Not specified
Harvest date Not specified
Plot size Not specified
Plot replication Not specified

Waite (HRZ) 2024

Sow date Not specified
Harvest date Not specified
Plot size Not specified
Plot replication Not specified

Longerenong (MRZ) 2021

Sow date Not specified
Harvest date Not specified
Plot size Not specified
Plot replication Not specified
Download the trial report to view additional method/treatment information
Trial source data and summary not available
Check the trial report PDF for trial results.
Observed trial site soil information
Trial site soil testing
Not specified
Soil conditions
Trial site Soil texture
Booleroo (LRZ), SA Not specified
Hart (MRZ), SA Not specified
Waite (HRZ), SA Not specified
Hamilton (HRZ), VIC Not specified
Kinnabulla (LRZ), VIC Not specified
Longerenong (MRZ), VIC Not specified
Nullawil (LRZ), VIC Not specified
Wallup (MRZ), VIC Not specified
Watchupga (LRZ), VIC Not specified
Derived trial site soil information
Australian Soil Classification Source: ASRIS
Trial site Soil order
Booleroo (LRZ), SA Sodosol
Hart (MRZ), SA Chromosol
Waite (HRZ), SA Chromosol
Hamilton (HRZ), VIC Kurosol
Kinnabulla (LRZ), VIC Calcarosol
Longerenong (MRZ), VIC Vertosol
Nullawil (LRZ), VIC Calcarosol
Wallup (MRZ), VIC Vertosol
Watchupga (LRZ), VIC Calcarosol

Climate

Derived climate information

No observed climate data available for this trial.
Derived climate data is determined from trial site location and national weather sources.

Booleroo (LRZ) VIC

Hart (MRZ) VIC

Waite (HRZ) VIC

Hamilton (HRZ) VIC

Kinnabulla (LRZ) VIC

Longerenong (MRZ) VIC

Nullawil (LRZ) VIC

Wallup (MRZ) VIC

Watchupga (LRZ) VIC

Booleroo (LRZ) VIC

NOTE: Exact trial site locality unknown - Climate data may not be accurate
Loading
Loading
Loading

Hart (MRZ) VIC

NOTE: Exact trial site locality unknown - Climate data may not be accurate
Loading
Loading
Loading

Waite (HRZ) VIC

NOTE: Exact trial site locality unknown - Climate data may not be accurate
Loading
Loading
Loading

Hamilton (HRZ) VIC

NOTE: Exact trial site locality unknown - Climate data may not be accurate
Loading
Loading
Loading

Kinnabulla (LRZ) VIC

NOTE: Exact trial site locality unknown - Climate data may not be accurate
Loading
Loading
Loading

Longerenong (MRZ) VIC

NOTE: Exact trial site locality unknown - Climate data may not be accurate
Loading
Loading
Loading

Nullawil (LRZ) VIC

NOTE: Exact trial site locality unknown - Climate data may not be accurate
Loading
Loading
Loading

Wallup (MRZ) VIC

NOTE: Exact trial site locality unknown - Climate data may not be accurate
Loading
Loading
Loading

Watchupga (LRZ) VIC

NOTE: Exact trial site locality unknown - Climate data may not be accurate
Loading
Loading
Loading

Some data on this site is sourced from the Bureau of Meteorology

SILO weather estimates sourced from https://www.longpaddock.qld.gov.au/silo/
Jeffrey, S.J., Carter, J.O., Moodie, K.B. and Beswick, A.R. (2001). Using spatial interpolation to construct a comprehensive archive of Australian climate data , Environmental Modelling and Software, Vol 16/4, pp 309-330. DOI: 10.1016/S1364-8152(01)00008-1.

Trial report and links

2021 trial report



Trial last modified: 22-04-2025 12:03pm AEST