| Researcher(s) |
Jenny Davidson Larn McMurray Richie Mould Penny Roberts Brenton Spriggs Christine Walela |
|---|---|
| Year(s) | 2016 - 2018 |
| Contributor | Hart Field Site Group |
| Trial location(s) |
, SA
Hart, SA Upper Eyre Peninsula, SA |
| Further information | View external link |
To assess Ascochyta blight severity and yield response to fungicides in field pea
• Understanding the key drivers of ascochyta blight (AB) disease in field pea, such as the level of starting inoculum and seasonal conditions pre and post sowing, is crucial to effective and economical management of this disease.
• In high disease risk seasons, foliar fungicides applied either before, or at the first sign of disease, and a follow up spray at early flowering reduced further spread.
• An additional foliar spray during spring may be required when wet and cool conditions cause late season infection on new growth.
• Recently registered products for AB on field peas demonstrated greater disease control and yield gain than older products.
• Disease control and yield improvement responses to fungicides have been observed where yield potential is >1.5 t/ha. Below that threshold, responses are generally not measurable and fungicides may not be economical.
| Lead research organisation | N/A |
|---|---|
| Host research organisation | N/A |
| Trial funding source | GRDC DAV00150 |
| Related program | N/A |
| Acknowledgments |
Funding for this work was provided through GRDC project DAV00150 (Southern Pulse Agronomy) and their support is greatly appreciated. We also acknowledge the support of research colleagues from the SARDI teams at Clare and Minnipa. Much gratitude also goes to the land owners/managers of the different farms where the trial sites were located, and to chemical companies for providing us with experimental fungicides to run our trials. |
| Other trial partners | Not specified |
| Crop type | Grain Legume: Field peas |
|---|---|
| Treatment type(s) |
|
| Trial type | Experimental |
| Trial design | Randomised,Replicated |
| Sow rate or Target density | 55 plants/m2 |
|---|---|
| Sow date | Multiple- please see trial report |
| Harvest date | Unknown |
| Plot size | Not specified |
| Plot replication | Not specified |
| Sow rate or Target density | 55 plants/m2 |
|---|---|
| Sow date | Multiple- please see trial report |
| Harvest date | Unknown |
| Plot size | Not specified |
| Plot replication | Not specified |
| Sow rate or Target density | 55 plants/m2 |
|---|---|
| Sow date | Multiple- please see trial report |
| Harvest date | Unknown |
| Plot size | Not specified |
| Plot replication | Not specified |
| Sow rate or Target density | 55 plants/m2 |
|---|---|
| Sow date | Multiple- please see trial report |
| Harvest date | Unknown |
| Plot size | Not specified |
| Plot replication | Not specified |
| Sow rate or Target density | 55 plants/m2 |
|---|---|
| Sow date | Multiple- please see trial report |
| Harvest date | Unknown |
| Plot size | Not specified |
| Plot replication | Not specified |
SILO weather estimates sourced from https://www.longpaddock.qld.gov.au/silo/
Jeffrey, S.J., Carter, J.O., Moodie, K.B. and Beswick, A.R. (2001). Using spatial interpolation to
construct a comprehensive archive of Australian climate data , Environmental Modelling and Software, Vol
16/4, pp 309-330. DOI: 10.1016/S1364-8152(01)00008-1.