Glufosinate adjuvants and water volume_Billa Billa

2025

Research organisation
Funding source

Trial details

Researcher(s) Lawrie Price
Year(s) 2025
Contributor MCA Agronomy
Trial location(s) Billa Billa, QLD
Glufosinate adjuvants and water volume_Billa Billa locations
Aims

To determine the effects of adjuvants with Biffo (Glufosinate) on control of large flowering feathertop Rhodes grass plants.

Key messages
  • An estimate of % burndown was made 7 days after treatment application. Treatment with Biffo alone resulted in an average Burndown score of 78%. Addition of adjuvants did not significantly impact burndown rating. Raising the rate of Biffo application to 10 L/ha increased the burndown score to 93%, a significant improvement.
  • The site was accidently over-sprayed by the grower at 9DAA by a herbicide mixture of Glyphosate 450 @ 2L/ha + Amicide 700 @ 500mL/ha. It was considered that this treatment would have had little effect on the trial as there was very little green leaf material present in most plots and neither of the products sprayed are very effective against FTR.
  • The trial needed to be terminated earlier then ideal on April 28th as the grower began planting the paddock to wheat. Consequently, a visual estimate of % control of feathertop Rhodes grass was made for each plot. Regrowth was evident in every plot.
  • Water volume had a significant impact on efficacy. On average % control where Biffo was sprayed at a volume of 75 L/ha was 61%. This increased to 82% where the application volume was increased to 150 L/ha.
  • Increasing the rate of Biffo application to 10 L/ha increased % control from 64% (at 3.75/ha) to 93%. Where Biffo was applied at 5L/ha (not included in the factorial) % control was rated at 83%
  • None of the adjuvants affected % control compared to Biffo alone. On Course appeared to give a poorer result than treatments containing AMS, Liase or Outright.
  • In this trial the effect of water volume and rate were much more important than choice of adjuvant.
Billa Billa QLD 2025

Trial design: Factorial

Lead research organisation N/A
Host research organisation N/A
Trial funding source GRDC MAA2405-002RTX,MAA2405-003RTX
Related program N/A
Acknowledgments N/A
Other trial partners Not specified
Download the trial report to view additional trial information

Method

Crop type Weed: Rhodes
Treatment type(s)
  • Herbicide
Trial type Experimental
Trial design Randomised,Replicated

Billa Billa 2025

?>
Sow date Not applicable
Harvest date Not applicable
Trial design method O Other
Total plots 60
Plot size 4m x 12m
Plot replication 3
Psuedoreplication N
Plot blocking yes
Plot randomisation Y
Herbicide

Please refer to the trial report for adjuvants and water volume details. 

Download the trial report to view additional method/treatment information
Trial source data and summary not available
Check the trial report PDF for trial results.
Observed trial site soil information
Trial site soil testing
Not specified
Soil conditions
Trial site Soil texture
Billa Billa, QLD Not specified
Derived trial site soil information
Australian Soil Classification Source: ASRIS
Trial site Soil order
Billa Billa, QLD Kandosol

Climate

Derived climate information

No observed climate data available for this trial.
Derived climate data is determined from trial site location and national weather sources.

Billa Billa QLD

NOTE: Exact trial site locality unknown - Climate data may not be accurate
Loading
Loading
Loading

Some data on this site is sourced from the Bureau of Meteorology

SILO weather estimates sourced from https://www.longpaddock.qld.gov.au/silo/
Jeffrey, S.J., Carter, J.O., Moodie, K.B. and Beswick, A.R. (2001). Using spatial interpolation to construct a comprehensive archive of Australian climate data , Environmental Modelling and Software, Vol 16/4, pp 309-330. DOI: 10.1016/S1364-8152(01)00008-1.

Trial report and links

2025 trial report



Trial last modified: 31-10-2025 14:50pm AEST