Building an understanding of normalised difference vegetation index (NDVI), through the comparison of nitrogen products, nitrogen application timing and rate in wheat and barley

2016

Research organisation

Trial details

Researcher(s) Nick Poole
Cassandra Schefe
Michael Straight
Year(s) 2016
Contributor Riverine Plains
Trial location(s) Yarrawonga, VIC
Building an understanding of normalised difference vegetation index (NDVI), through the comparison of nitrogen products, nitrogen application timing and rate in wheat and barley locations
Aims

The specific aims of this trial were to:
• understand if the crop responded differently to urea compared with Easy N (liquid nitrogen)
• define the sensitivity with which the NDVI method can detect differences in timing and rate of nitrogen application
• determine if wheat and barley respond comparatively to nitrogen type (product), timing and rate, as measured by NDVI
• quantify how the use of different nitrogen types, timing and rates influence grain yield and quality.

Key messages
  • A wet winter and spring during 2016 meant that nitrogen (N) applied at sowing was inefficient in meeting crop requirements during the season, due to high losses through leaching and denitrification.
  • Application of nitrogen at first node (GS31) and third node (GS33) improved crop uptake, and was reflected as increased ‘greenness’ in wheat towards the end of the season, as measured by normalised difference vegetation index (NDVI).
  • Using the Greenseeker® to measure NDVI in-crop was useful to determine crop responses to fertiliser treatments, and aligned well with final yield results.
  • Determining crop nitrogen requirements based on in-crop NDVI readings improved the efficiency of nitrogen supply, as nitrogen was only added as needed, reducing input costs.
  • For both wheat and barley there was no difference between urea and Easy N® in terms of tiller and head numbers, dry matter (DM) production, yield or grain quality parameters when comparable nitrogen application rates and timings were used.
Lead research organisation N/A
Host research organisation N/A
Related program N/A
Acknowledgments N/A
Other trial partners Not specified
Download the trial report to view additional trial information

Method

Crop types Cereal (Grain): Barley Cereal (Grain): Wheat
Treatment type(s)
  • Fertiliser : Rate
  • Fertiliser : Timing
  • Fertiliser : Type
Trial type Experimental
Trial design Randomised,Replicated,Blocked

Yarrawonga 2016 Barley

Sow date 17 May 2016
Harvest date 1 December 2016
Trial design method RCBD Randomised Complete Block Design
Plot size Not specified
Plot replication Not specified
Plot randomisation Y

Yarrawonga 2016 Wheat

Sow date 17 May 2016
Harvest date 1 December 2016
Trial design method RCBD Randomised Complete Block Design
Plot size Not specified
Plot replication Not specified
Plot randomisation Y
Download the trial report to view additional method/treatment information
Trial source data and summary not available
Check the trial report PDF for trial results.
Observed trial site soil information
Trial site soil testing
Not specified
Soil conditions
Trial site Soil texture
Yarrawonga, VIC Not specified
Derived trial site soil information
Australian Soil Classification Source: ASRIS
Trial site Soil order
Yarrawonga, VIC Sodosol
Soil Moisture Source: BOM/ANU
Average amount of water stored in the soil profile during the year, estimated by the OzWALD model-data fusion system.
Year Yarrawonga VIC
2016
2015
2014
2013
2012
2011
2010
2009
2008
2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000

Climate

Derived climate information

No observed climate data available for this trial.
Derived climate data is determined from trial site location and national weather sources.

Yarrawonga VIC

Loading
Loading
Loading

Some data on this site is sourced from the Bureau of Meteorology

SILO weather estimates sourced from https://www.longpaddock.qld.gov.au/silo/
Jeffrey, S.J., Carter, J.O., Moodie, K.B. and Beswick, A.R. (2001). Using spatial interpolation to construct a comprehensive archive of Australian climate data , Environmental Modelling and Software, Vol 16/4, pp 309-330. DOI: 10.1016/S1364-8152(01)00008-1.

Trial report and links

2016 trial report



Trial last modified: 21-10-2025 16:43pm AEST