| Researcher(s) |
Jason Condon Barry Haskins Rachael Whitworth |
|---|---|
| Year(s) | 2022 - 2023 |
| Contributor | Ag Grow Agronomy and Research Pty Ltd |
| Trial location(s) |
Griffith, NSW
|
The aims of this trial project were to measure:
1. The efficacy of applied lime on grain yield and profitability
2. Differences between incorporation methods
3. Differences between incorporation depths
4. Impact on phosphorous uptake efficiency
• Lime has increased soil pH, soil P availability and shown interesting interactions with micronutrients.
• Incorporation of lime to the depth of the acidic layer is necessary. Cultivation alone, without the addition of lime, had no influence on soil pH. In treatments where lime was applied at 3 t/ha, cultivation increased the depth of pH change. In treatments where 6 t/ha lime was applied, soil pH increased to a depth of 20cm relative to the control.
• Increase in soil pH resulted in an increase in available phosphorus, with an increase of 7-8 mg/kg Colwell P observed in the surface layer of limed versus unlimed plots.
• Liming promoted the uptake of applied micronutrients, with yield gains up to 0.5 t/ha observed in this trial by applying a micronutrient (zinc, copper & molybdenum) foliar spray with lime, compared to where micronutrients were applied without lime.
• Whilst cultivation alone had no influence on grain yield in 2022, both lime application and cultivation provided some benefits in 2023.
• After 2 years no economic advantage of lime was observed, although it is expected that lime will continue to provide economic benefits in the rotation in the future.
| Lead research organisation | N/A |
|---|---|
| Host research organisation | N/A |
| Trial funding source | GRDC AGG2206-001RTX |
| Related program | N/A |
| Acknowledgments | N/A |
| Other trial partners | Not specified |
| Crop types | Cereal (Grain): Wheat Oilseed: Canola |
|---|---|
| Treatment type(s) |
|
| Trial type | Experimental |
| Trial design | Replicated |
| Sow rate or Target density | 40 kg/ha |
|---|---|
| Sowing machinery |
Trial was sown with a Morris Contour Drill plot seeder with 25cm row spacings x 7 rows. |
| Sow date | 6 May 2022 |
| Harvest date | 1 December 2022 |
| Trial design method | RCBD Randomised Complete Block Design |
| Plot size | 36m x 1.75m |
| Plot replication | 4 |
| Plot randomisation | Y |
| Fertiliser |
sowing fertiliser: 80 Kg/ha MAP |
| Fungicide | Not specified |
| Pesticide | Not specified |
| Other trial notes |
This trial is part of a 3 year trial project. Refer to https://www.farmtrials.com.au/trial/40907 for details of 2024 trials. |
| Sow rate or Target density | 2.5 kg/ha |
|---|---|
| Sowing machinery | Not specified |
| Sow date | 14 April 2023 |
| Harvest date | 24 October 2023 |
| Trial design method | RCBD Randomised Complete Block Design |
| Plot size | 36m x 1.75m |
| Plot replication | 4 |
| Plot randomisation | Y |
| Fertiliser |
100 kg/ha urea was spread on 1st April, and the trials were top dressed with 100 kg/ha Gran-Am in July |
| Fungicide |
Trials sprayed early August with 450ml/ha Prosaro. |
| Pesticide |
Trials were baited for mice after sowing. |
| Other trial notes |
This trial is part of a 3 year trial project. Refer to https://www.farmtrials.com.au/trial/40907 for details of 2024 trials. |
SILO weather estimates sourced from https://www.longpaddock.qld.gov.au/silo/
Jeffrey, S.J., Carter, J.O., Moodie, K.B. and Beswick, A.R. (2001). Using spatial interpolation to
construct a comprehensive archive of Australian climate data , Environmental Modelling and Software, Vol
16/4, pp 309-330. DOI: 10.1016/S1364-8152(01)00008-1.