Identifying potassium responsive soils and best practice application of K in the MRZ and HRZ of the Southern Region

2022 - 2023

Research organisation
Funding source
Trengove Consulting

Trial details

Researcher(s) Declan Anderson
jordan bruce
Sarah Noack
Stuart Sherriff
Sam Trengove
Nigel Wilhelm
Contact email samtrenny34@hotmail.com
Year(s) 2022 - 2023
Contributor Trengove Consulting
Trial location(s) Maitland, SA
Identifying potassium responsive soils and best practice application of K in the MRZ and HRZ of the Southern Region locations
Aims

The project reported here aims to help grain growers diagnose where K deficiency is limiting their productivity and profitability. It also aims to identify the most cost-effective applications of K fertiliser, where they are needed the most, and to avoid wasteful applications where K deficiency is unlikely.

Key messages
  • Two K response trials (0 and 150 kg K/ha) were established in 2022. 
    • At Maitland (Colwell K 98 mg/kg) wheat was responsive to K, increasing in grain yield from 5.4 t/ha to 7.4 t/ha with added K. Residual effects from the K application were also measured the following season in lentil.  
    • At Arthurton (Colwell K 200 mg/kg) lentil (2022) and wheat (2023) were not responsive to K fertiliser application.  
  • Potassium application strategy trials showed wheat grain yields were highest where K (MoP) was banded below the seed at rates of 50 and 75 kg K/ha. These two treatments consistently showed increased biomass, shoot K and K uptake early in the season. 
  • The response from broadcasting K was variable (no response or moderately responsive) across two seasons. 
  • Foliar application of K was not an effective application strategy. 
  • These results suggest the soil test K critical limit for wheat on soils of the Yorke Peninsula is much higher than the 45 mg/kg currently used by the grains industry. 
Lead research organisation Trengove Consulting
Host research organisation N/A
Trial funding source GRDC UOA2201-002RTX
Related program N/A
Acknowledgments N/A
Other trial partners Not specified
Download the trial report to view additional trial information

Method

Crop type Cereal (Grain): Wheat
Treatment type(s)
  • Fertiliser : Application Method
  • Fertiliser : Rate
  • Fertiliser : Timing
Trial type Experimental
Trial design Randomised,Replicated

Maitland 2022

Sow date Not specified
Harvest date Not specified
Plot size Not specified
Plot replication Not specified

Maitland 2023

Sow date Not specified
Harvest date Not specified
Plot size Not specified
Plot replication Not specified
Download the trial report to view additional method/treatment information
Trial source data and summary not available
Check the trial report PDF for trial results.
Observed trial site soil information
Trial site soil testing
Not specified
Soil conditions
Trial site Soil texture
Maitland, SA Not specified
Derived trial site soil information
Australian Soil Classification Source: ASRIS
Trial site Soil order
Maitland, SA Sodosol

Climate

Derived climate information

No observed climate data available for this trial.
Derived climate data is determined from trial site location and national weather sources.

Maitland SA

NOTE: Exact trial site locality unknown - Climate data may not be accurate
Loading
Loading
Loading

Some data on this site is sourced from the Bureau of Meteorology

SILO weather estimates sourced from https://www.longpaddock.qld.gov.au/silo/
Jeffrey, S.J., Carter, J.O., Moodie, K.B. and Beswick, A.R. (2001). Using spatial interpolation to construct a comprehensive archive of Australian climate data , Environmental Modelling and Software, Vol 16/4, pp 309-330. DOI: 10.1016/S1364-8152(01)00008-1.

Trial report and links

2022 trial report



Trial last modified: 22-12-2025 17:23pm AEST