Comparison of barley varieties

2017
CC BY 4.0

Research organisaton

Trial details

Researcher(s) Dylan Bruce (Hart Field Site Group)
Year(s) 2017
Contributor Hart Field Site Group
Trial location(s) Hart, SA
Comparison of barley varieties locations
Aims

To compare the performance of new barley varieties against the current industry standards.

Key messages
  • Oxford, Fleet, Hindmarsh and Keel were the highest yielding feed barley varieties at Hart averaging 4.57 t/ha.
  • Navigator, GrangeR and LaTrobe were the highest yielding malt barley varieties averaging 4.68 t/ha.
  • RGT Planet (undergoing malt accreditation) was the highest yielding barley variety at Hart, at 5.85 t/ha.
Lead research organisation Hart Field Site Group
Host research organisation N/A
Related program N/A
Acknowledgments N/A
Other trial partners Not specified
Download the trial report to view additional trial information

Method

Crop type Cereal (Grain): Barley
Treatment type(s)
  • Crop: Variety
Trial type Experimental
Trial design Randomised,Replicated,Blocked

Hart 2017

Sow date 8 May 2017
Harvest date Not specified
Plot size 1.75m x 10m
Plot replication Not specified
Fertiliser
  • DAP (18:20) + Impact @ 100 kg/ha
  • UAN (42:0) @ 60 L/ha on 3rd July
Other trial notes

While all due care has been taken in compiling the information within this manual the Hart Field-Site Group Inc or researchers involved take no liability resulting from the interpretation or use of these results. We do not endorse or recommend the products of any manufacturers referred to. Other products may perform as well or better than those specifically referred to. Any research with un-registered products and rates in the manual does not constitute a recommendation for that particular use by the researchers or the Hart Field-Site Group Inc.

Download the trial report to view additional method/treatment information

Download results

Trial results Table 1

# Variety
Screenings (%) Test weight (kg/hL) Protein (%) Grain yield (t/ha)
1 Fathorn 1.2 69 8.4 4.09
2 Fleet 1.4 65.9 8.1 4.53
3 Hindmarsh 1.7 72.7 8.3 4.28
4 Keel 1 70.4 8 4.46
5 Oxford 1.6 70.8 6.8 4.72
6 Rosalind 0.9 71 8.2 3.99
7 Charger 2 68.9 8.1 4.21
8 Commander 2.1 68.6 8.1 4.44
9 Granger 0.7 71.3 7.3 4.72
10 La Trobe 1.2 73.3 7.5 4.51
11 Navigator 0.7 68.4 7.2 4.82
12 Schooner 0.9 71.9 7.9 2.12
13 Scope 0.7 72.1 7.1 3.89
14 Westminster 0.6 71.3 7.3 4.44
15 Compass 0.7 70.9 8.1 4.49
16 RGT Planet 1.1 69.5 6.3 5.85
17 Spartacus CL (IGB1334T) 0.7 73.4 7.2 4.29

Grain yield t/ha


Loading

Protein %


Loading

Screenings %


Loading

Test weight kg/hL


Loading
Observed trial site soil information
Trial site soil testing
Not specified
Soil conditions
Trial site Soil texture
Hart, SA Not specified
Derived trial site soil information
Australian Soil Classification Source: ASRIS
Trial site Soil order
Hart, SA Chromosol
Soil Moisture Source: BOM/ANU
Average amount of water stored in the soil profile during the year, estimated by the OzWALD model-data fusion system.
Year Hart SA
2017 650.0mm
2016 659.9mm
2015 597.6mm
2014 638.6mm
2013 622.8mm
2012 654.6mm
2011 683.8mm
2010 686.7mm
2009 669.9mm
2008 633.9mm
2007 649.9mm
2006 651.2mm
2005 675.4mm
2004 633.0mm
2003 652.2mm
2002 649.4mm
2001 674.5mm
2000 625.6mm
National soil grid Source: CSIRO/TERN
NOTE: National Soil Grid data is aggregated information for background information on the wider area
Actual soil values can vary significantly in a small area and the trial soil tests are the most relevant data where available

Soil properties

Loading

Climate

Derived climate information

No observed climate data available for this trial.
Derived climate data is determined from trial site location and national weather sources.

Hart SA

Loading
Loading
Loading

Some data on this site is sourced from the Bureau of Meteorology

SILO weather estimates sourced from https://www.longpaddock.qld.gov.au/silo/
Jeffrey, S.J., Carter, J.O., Moodie, K.B. and Beswick, A.R. (2001). Using spatial interpolation to construct a comprehensive archive of Australian climate data , Environmental Modelling and Software, Vol 16/4, pp 309-330. DOI: 10.1016/S1364-8152(01)00008-1.

Trial report and links

2017 trial report



Trial last modified: 11-06-2019 15:09pm AEST