Susceptibility of chickpea varieties to seed markings – Tamworth and Trangie 2013–2015

2013 - 2015

Research organisaton
Funding sources

Trial details

Researcher(s) Leigh Jenkins (NSW DPI)
Catherine Keir (NSW DPI)
Andrew Verrell (NSW DPI)
Jenny Wood (NSW DPI)
Year(s) 2013 - 2015
Contributor Department of Primary Industries NSW
Trial location(s) Tamworth Agricultural Institute, NSW
Further information View external link
Susceptibility of chickpea varieties to seed markings – Tamworth and Trangie 2013–2015 locations
Aims

 To compare the incidence of seed markings (tiger stripe/blotch) for a range of commercial chickpea varieties and advanced breeding lines sown on two sowing dates on the central western and north-western slopes of NSW.

Key messages
  • The 2013 Tamworth and 2014 Trangie environments were not conducive to high levels of seed markings, with all varieties having <5% tiger stripe/blotches.
  • The later sown chickpeas had a lower incidence of seed markings in two of the three environments.
  • The 2015 Tamworth experiment was conducive to seed markings for the first sowing date (SD1). In this case, the most susceptible commercial varieties were PBA PistolA and PBA BoundaryA, with 9.7% and 6.7% of individual seeds having tiger stripe/blotches respectively.
  • All five kabuli varieties did not display any seed markings in any of the three environments.
  • All desi varieties showed at least low levels of tiger stripe/blotch type markings in one or more of the three environments and two sowing dates

Conclusions

Time of sowing and variety influence the amount of seeds showing the tiger stripe/blotching type markings in chickpea. Kabuli chickpeas do not suffer from this defect. Desi chickpeas sown in mid-June at Tamworth and Trangie had a lower incidence of this type of seed marking. Research is ongoing to identify both the genetic basis and the environmental triggers of tiger stripe/blotch type markings in desi chickpeas to minimise any potential risk to the Australian chickpea industry.

Lead research organisation Department of Primary Industries NSW
Host research organisation N/A
Trial funding source GRDC DAN00196
Trial funding source DPI NSW DAN00196
Related program N/A
Acknowledgments

This experiment was part of the project Eliminating grain defects in chickpeas (DAN00196; 2014–2016), a collaborative pulse project with joint investment by NSW DPI and GRDC. The evaluation of these experiments were value-adding to project DAS00140 (2013–2015), a collaborative project, with joint investment by SARDI and GRDC and led by Dr Victor Sadras, with these experiments sown by NSW DPI. Technical assistance provided by Narelle Egan, Bec Miller, Matt Grinter, Michael Nowland and Julie Miller (NSW DPI, Tamworth) and Scott Richards, Jayne Jenkins and Liz Jenkins (NSW DPI, Trangie) is gratefully acknowledged.


Other trial partners Not specified
Download the trial report to view additional trial information

Method

Crop type Grain Legume: Chickpeas
Treatment type(s)
  • Crop: Variety
  • Harvest
  • Sowing: Timing
Trial type Experimental
Trial design Replicated

Tamworth Agricultural Institute 2013

Sow rate or Target density 30 plants/m2
Sow rate or Target density 30 plants/m2
Sow date 22 June 2013 Tamworth 2013: 22nd June and 26th July. Trangie 2014: 29th May and 19th June. Tamworth 2015: 18th Ma
Harvest date Not specified
Plot size Not specified
Plot replication Not specified
Psuedoreplication Not specified
Fertiliser

50 kg/ha of Starter 12 Zn 

Fungicide

P-Pickel T® (360 g/L thiram, 200 g/L thiabendazole) and Metalaxyl (250 g/L) 

Seed treatment P-Pickel T® (360 g/L thiram, 200 g/L thiabendazole) and Metalaxyl (250 g/L)
Inoculant water furrow injected rhizobia
Other trial notes

This research paper is an extract from the publication Northern grains Research Results 2017, available at
https://www.dpi.nsw.gov.au/agriculture/broadacre-crops/guides/publications/ngrt-results
 

Tamworth Agricultural Institute 2014

Sow rate or Target density Not specified
Sow rate or Target density Not specified
Sow date Not specified
Harvest date Not specified
Plot size Not specified
Plot replication Not specified
Psuedoreplication Not specified
Fertiliser Not specified
Fungicide Not specified
Seed treatment Not specified
Inoculant Not specified
Other trial notes

This research paper is an extract from the publication Northern grains Research Results 2017, available at
https://www.dpi.nsw.gov.au/agriculture/broadacre-crops/guides/publications/ngrt-results
 

Tamworth Agricultural Institute 2015

Sow rate or Target density Not specified
Sow rate or Target density Not specified
Sow date Not specified
Harvest date Not specified
Plot size Not specified
Plot replication Not specified
Psuedoreplication Not specified
Fertiliser Not specified
Fungicide Not specified
Seed treatment Not specified
Inoculant Not specified
Other trial notes

This research paper is an extract from the publication Northern grains Research Results 2017, available at
https://www.dpi.nsw.gov.au/agriculture/broadacre-crops/guides/publications/ngrt-results
 

Download the trial report to view additional method/treatment information
Trial source data and summary not available
Check the trial report PDF for trial results.
Observed trial site soil information
Trial site soil testing
Not specified
Soil conditions
Trial site Soil texture
Tamworth Agricultural Institute, NSW Not specified
Derived trial site soil information
Australian Soil Classification Source: ASRIS
Trial site Soil order
Tamworth Agricultural Institute, NSW Vertosol
Soil Moisture Source: BOM/ANU
Average amount of water stored in the soil profile during the year, estimated by the OzWALD model-data fusion system.
Year Tamworth Agricultural Institute NSW
2015 788.3mm
2014 788.1mm
2013 780.3mm
2012 774.5mm
2011 772.8mm
2010 799.1mm
2009 784.3mm
2008 792.0mm
2007 788.5mm
2006 790.3mm
2005 797.4mm
2004 799.1mm
2003 800.0mm
2002 781.0mm
2001 777.0mm
2000 747.4mm
National soil grid Source: CSIRO/TERN
NOTE: National Soil Grid data is aggregated information for background information on the wider area
Actual soil values can vary significantly in a small area and the trial soil tests are the most relevant data where available

Soil properties

Loading

Climate

Derived climate information

No observed climate data available for this trial.
Derived climate data is determined from trial site location and national weather sources.

Tamworth Agricultural Institute NSW

Loading
Loading
Loading

Some data on this site is sourced from the Bureau of Meteorology

SILO weather estimates sourced from https://www.longpaddock.qld.gov.au/silo/
Jeffrey, S.J., Carter, J.O., Moodie, K.B. and Beswick, A.R. (2001). Using spatial interpolation to construct a comprehensive archive of Australian climate data , Environmental Modelling and Software, Vol 16/4, pp 309-330. DOI: 10.1016/S1364-8152(01)00008-1.

Trial report and links

2013 trial report

2013 trial report



Trial last modified: 10-06-2023 20:23pm AEST